There's the usual stuff of Poirot like long and lengthy deductions of his own little grey cells, bit of French here and there and his knack for observation and details of course. Hastings was missing who was replaced by a young chap at the Scotland Yard called Edward Catchpool.
Is there?
Catchpool himself had chills when he first saw the bodies he told Poirot.
Were they murdered for a dark past or a haunting future?
Catchpool was sent to Great Holling to dig up their past, and also to get the present news of the village. He was a young chap in his early thirties, wanting to make it big in Scotland Yard.
He did find some interesting and surprising truths about the three victims and how they were all connected. It was all narrated by Margaret Ernst the late vicars wife. The vicar who was replaced by Patrick Ive.
Patrick Ive and Frances his wife had a terrible death due to a horrible rumour which was a lie.
As more evidence was unearthed, more truth was discovered and also the murder was getting a bit clear. The motive, the murderer, the accomplices and also how it was done. There was revelation which lead to a greater revelation.
Who killed them? Was it done by single person or by persons who wanted revenge?
Or maybe by someone who wanted to escape death themselves?
Read the book to find out what actually happened in the Bloxham Hotel and to put an end to the questions.
The real truth, the deduction is done of course by Hercule Poirot himself. The lengthy deduction is where most of the truth is unraveled.
Overall it was a good read. Not so lengthy that it might bore the reader. And it wasn't easily deducible because of obvious reasons.